Man bags 42-year jail for robbery |
The convict was arraigned on a two-count charge of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and armed robbery on May 9, 2011. Effiong and other members of his gang robbed their victim of N150,000, two mobile phone handsets and other valuables on Sheraton Link Road, Ikeja.
During the trial, the prosecution led by Mrs. M. B. Olaniyi, Director, Administrator-General and Public Trustee in the Lagos State Ministry of Justice, called Corporal Gowon Melinga, who said he and his anti-robbery team arrested the convict while he and his gang were robbing their victim.
The witness tendered a confessional statement made by the convict. The convict admitted in the confessional statement that he and his gang operating on a motorcycle robbed Ukadike at gunpoint on December 31, 2009 in order to get money for New Year’s celebration.
In his defence, Effiong, however, denied making any confessional statement to the police.
At the close of trial, counsel for the defendant, Kazeem Lukman, urged the court to discharge and acquit Effiong, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the offences of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and armed robbery beyond reasonable doubt.
But Mrs. Olaniyi urged the court to hold that the prosecution had proved the offences against the convict and that the retraction of the confessional statement was an afterthought.
Delivering judgement, Justice Olabisi Akinlade, held that the prosecution had a burden to prove the offences of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and armed robbery beyond reasonable doubt.
From the evidence adduced at the trial, the judge said, the prosecution was unable to prove the offences of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and armed robbery against the convict.
The prosecution, she held, only tendered a pair of pliers. She added that the instrument tendered by the prosecution could not be regarded as a dangerous weapon required to prove armed robbery, which attracts a mandatory death sentence.
Justice Akinlade, however, said from the evidence before the court, the prosecution succeeded in establishing the offences of conspiracy to commit robbery and robbery against the convict.
She dismissed Effiong’s retraction of his confessional statement, saying the evidence corroborated the prosecution witness’ testimony that he and his gang apprehended the convict at the scene of crime when the latter gave up on his attempt to jump into the canal for fear of death and begged policemen to rescue him from the point he was hanging.
Called by the court to make his allocutus (plea to court to temper justice with mercy), counsel for the defence urged Justice Akinlade to consider the fact that the convict was a young Nigerian who could change if given the opportunity to do so.
The judge, however, held that the court must balance the plea against the interest of society to punish crime.
She subsequently sentenced the convict, who was 23 years old at the time of committiing the crime, to 21 years in jail for each of the offences of conspiracy to commit robbery and robbery. She, however, ordered that the sentences should run concurrently.
No comments:
Post a Comment