Iranian leader rips ISIS, questions U.S. willingness to 'sacrifice' in terror fight
September 17, 2014 -- Updated
Hassan Rouhani, in an interview with NBC News, characterized ISIS's recent beheadings of three Western captives are offensive to all people, including Muslims like himself.
"They want to kill
humanity and, from the viewpoint of the Islamic tenets and culture,
killing an innocent person equals the killing of (all) humanity,"
Rouhani said of ISIS militants, according to the translation on NBC's
website. " ... The killing and beheading of innocent people, in fact, is
a matter of shame on them and a matter of concern and sorry for all ...
mankind."
The only relevant thing
about the victims is that they were innocent, not their nationalities or
religions, according to Rouhani. The three killed were British aid
worker David Haines and American journalists James Foley and Steven
Sotloff. Sotloff was Jewish and had dual citizenship with Israel.
Zakaria: U.S. playing into ISIS' game
Obama: This will not be America's fight
Gingrich: ISIS fight will be long
"Who can really tolerate
to see an innocent person be executed?" said the Iranian president. "It
doesn't make any difference, from our viewpoint, if the person is
Muslim, Jewish, Christian or (a) follower of any other religion. It is
not important to us ... which nationality he belongs to."
Rouhani's position on ISIS isn't entirely new or unexpected.
The group is made up of
Sunni Muslims aiming to create a vast caliphate in the region under its
strict, distinct version of Sharia law. Iran consists predominantly of
Shia Muslims, and it could find itself under attack if ISIS militants
move east from Iraq into its territory.
Iran isn't alone in its
stance on ISIS. U.S. President Barack Obama has been active in his
opposition to the group, ordering airstrikes targeting ISIS in Iraq and
promising similar air attacks on the group in Syria.
In his NBC interview,
Rouhani did not appear supportive or impressed with Washington's plan to
form a coalition -- one which he called "ridiculous" -- or its using
airstrikes, rather than ground forces, to combat the ISIS threat.
The Iranian president
asked rhetorically if the United States, by conducting airstrikes but
refusing to put its own troops into battle, is "afraid of their soldiers
being killed in the fight they claim is against terrorism."
"If they want to use
planes and if they want to use unmanned planes, so that nobody is
injured from the Americans -- is it really possible to fight terrorism
without any hardship, without any sacrifice?" he added.
Rouhani then made an
apparent allusion to possible airstrikes against ISIS in Syria --
something that U.S. officials would be done without coordinating with
the government of President Bashar al-Assad.
Washington has backed
moderate opposition forces working to oust al-Assad; Tehran, meanwhile,
is an ally of the embattled Syrian leader.
"Maybe it is necessary
for airstrikes in some conditions and some circumstances," Rouhani told
NBC's Ann Curry. "However, airstrikes should take place with the
permission of the people of that county and the government of that
country."
Ali Shamkhani, the
secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, told state-run
Press TV that Iran turned down an invite from Denmark Foreign Minister
Martin Lidegaard to join the U.S.-led alliance to fight ISIS.
Shamkhani surmised
Wednesday that one of this coalition's chief goals is to protect Israel
and that Tehran doesn't believe it will be effective.
"The alliance ... for
confronting this terrorist group is an effort to forge safe borders for
the Zionist regime rather than bring about regional stability and
security for the oppressed people of the (Middle East)," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment