Top U.S. military officer: U.S. ground troops to fight ISIS, if necessary
September 17, 2014 -- Updated
.
Gen. Martin Dempsey, the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate Armed Services
Committee that it was possible that U.S. troops advising and assisting
Iraq's military could be deployed to fight.
"To be clear, if we reach
the point where I believe our advisers should accompany Iraqi troops on
attacks against specific ISIL targets, I will recommend that to the
President," Dempsey said during testimony before the committee.
Dempsey's comments, which
he made several times under questioning by senators, contradicts
President Barack Obama's promise that the campaign to defeat and destroy
the terrorist group that calls itself the Islamic State would not
include American "boots on the ground."
Hagel: We need all resources against ISIS
Protesters removed from Senate hearing
Congress to consider Syria strategy
The contradiction quickly
raised a question for the White House: How is serving as "close combat
advisers" -- in Dempsey's words -- not a combat role?
Sen. Jim Inhofe,
R-Oklahoma, the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, pressed
Dempsey on the issue at one point in the hearing, asking if pilots
dropping bombs in Iraq were part of a combat mission and if the U.S.
would rescue any pilots shot down.
Dempsey responded "Yes and yes."
The Obama administration moved quickly to tamp down any suggestion that the United States would deploy combat troops.
Even Defense Secretary
Chuck Hagel, who was seated next to Dempsey at the Senate committee
hearing, repeated the President's promise.
White House spokesman
Josh Earnest reiterated Obama's position, telling reporters that U.S.
troops -- some 1,600 -- in Iraq were serving in advise-and-assist roles,
staffing the joint operation centers and defending the Embassy in
Baghdad and the consulate in Irbil.
"What he's been very
specific and precise about is that he will not deploy ground troops in a
combat role into Iraq or Syria," Earnest told reporters.
The Pentagon's
spokesman, Rear Adm. John Kirby, characterized Dempsey's statement as a
hypothetical, saying on CNN's "Amanpour" that the chairman was speaking
about his "best military advice" should U.S. troops in Iraq need to act
in an advise-and-assist role with "lower level units."
"If he felt that the
strategy as it was being proposed and executed was failing that he would
not hesitate to change his advice to the commander in chief about maybe
putting advisers in lower level units out there," Kirby said.
"But he also said that
he supports the strategy that we are executing right now, and he also
said that he doesn't believe we are at that stage right now."
Even so, when pushed
during his testimony to expand on his statement, Dempsey told the
senators that if the current approach fails, he may recommend the use of
ground troops.
Manchin: I'm voting no on arming rebels
What will it take to defeat ISIS?
America's most wanted terrorists
The committee hearing
came as the House prepares to vote to give the President authorization
to arm and train moderate Syrian rebel groups that have been vetted. A
Senate vote on the measure would follow.
The Obama administration has, however, ruled out putting U.S. military advisers on the ground in Syria.
Early in his testimony,
Dempsey also seemed to lay out a new version of the administration's
mission, saying it was to "destroy" ISIS in Iraq and to "disrupt" it in
Syria.
The hearing was
interrupted several times by antiwar protesters from the groups Code
Pink and Popular Resistance, each of whom chanted and held up signs
until they were ejected.
"There is no military solution," one woman chanted. "America does not want war."
The latest CNN/ORC poll
shows the American public is worried about the threat of ISIS, with 87%
saying they are "very concerned" or "somewhat concerned" about the
group. About three-quarters of Americans support U.S. airstrikes against
ISIS in Iraq and in Syria, and 38% even support putting U.S. ground
troops in Iraq or Syria.
No comments:
Post a Comment